Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Representation of Gender in Darfurian Charity Organizations

The genocide in Darfur is an atrocity that affects thousands of people every day. Men, women, and children are being killed everyday simply because their government and its followers do not like the color of their skin. There are a several human rights groups working to end the killing in Darfur, and even an alliance of over 100 groups working together, SaveDarfur.org. The other human rights group that will be looked at is EyesonDarfur.org.

Both of these websites show the impact of the events in Darfur with pleas for help and donations, or simply to educate ones self about the events happening there. On both of these websites there is access to different pictures of the people in Darfur, some refugees and others tragic victims. Since the genocide in Darfur affects all the people there one would assume that there would be equal representation of age groups and sexes, however this is not so. Most of the pictures posted there are of women (of many ages) and children, with very few men; there are even more female children present in the pictures than male children. On EyesonDarfur.org they have a photo gallery of 10 pictures that plays like a slide show, explaining each photo. Only 2 of these photos include men, and one of those photos is of African union soldiers. One photo is of a burning village, while the other 7 are devoted to women and children. Of these pictures, 2 are of only young girls, 1 is of a group of women, 1 is of a deceased older women, and the others include male children, but the male children are not alone; they are all with a mother figure or other female figure. (To view this slideshow click here)


On the front page of SaveDarfur.org, there are a collection of news articles, blog posts, and other links for more information. At the top there are 3 photos in the heading along with the Save Darfur logo. This heading rotates between 3 different sets of pictures, 9 all together.









As you will notice, there are only 2 photos out of the 9 that have a strong male representation. The head on picture of the adult male is striking, but it does not evoke the same emotion as the head on pictures of the girl and the young woman. The picture of the man does not create the same sense of need (from the subject of the picture) and viewer guilt that the pictures of the women and girls do. The sense of guilt is most strong in the pictures including children or women (mothers) with their children.

This concept is in concordance with Susan Moeller’s Hierarchy of Innocence. She lists the hierarchy of innocence as such: “Crowned by the most innocent, the hierarchy begins with infants and then includes, in descending order, children up to the age of 12, pregnant women, teenage girls, elderly women, all other women, teenage boys, and all other men,” (p49). The photos on both of these websites coincide with Moeller’s assessment of the hierarchy of innocence. The significance of this is that western audiences are most likely to identify or sympathize with the most innocent, making it more likely for them to be moved to action. An audience would be much more enraged or inclined to do something about the suffering of a child or children than they would for an adult man or even a group of adult men.

This point is emphasized by StopGenocideNow's Flickr photo account. It seems that this user was in Darfur for a time and took photos of the people there. The absolute majority of his photos are of women and children, with a few teenage boys, and about 10 pictures involving adult men. This is out of about approximately 12 pages of photos solely of Darfurians, 18 pictures per page, that makes roughly 216 pictures. That's a 4.6% representation rate.

WHY?

So in light of the previous discussion, here is a question that I would like to pose: Why? Why is it that there is so little representation of the men of Darfur?



Do they suffer less?


A man weeps on returning to find his home in the village of Nami, north Darfur, burned down. Adam Saleh said janjaweed militia rode in and shot dead 10 villagers, forcing the rest to flee (Flickr).


The man in this photo, Amet Dot, experienced the genocide in Darfur personally. One day, while he was away from his village, the Janjaweed attacked his village, burned it to the ground, loaded the nearly 10,000 people into a 28 car train, set it in motion, and set it on fire. His entire family, wife, children, grandchildren, were among those burned to death in that train (Christine).



Are they less vulnerable?


A Darfurian Man (KK Herald).


Are they affected less?


A displaced Sudanese man looks at his burnt-down house after militiamen burnt the Sereaf village, southwest of Al Genenia, in west Darfur along the Sudan Chad border, April 22, 2005 (Sudan Tribune).



A man holds seeds, all he has left, at the remains of his home in the Central African Republic, where violence from Sudan has spilled over (Cooper).

Works Cited.



Christine. "You are Helping Save Darfur" Weblog Entry. Mocha Club. 19 July 2006. 3 June 2008. [http://blog.mochaclub.org/articles/2006/07/19/you-are-helping-
save-darfur].

Cooper, Helene. "US Sends (Another) Warning". New York Times. 11 April 2007. 3 June 2008. [http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/11/washington/11darfur.html?_
r=1&oref=slogin].

Eyes on Darfur. EyesonDarfur.org. 27 May 2008. [www.eyesondarfur.org]

Flickr. Yahoo! Inc. 3 June 2008. [http://www.flickr.com/photos/gethinchamberlain/350933138/], [http://www.flickr.com/photos/stopgenocidenow/].

KK Herald. "Man-Eaters of Darfur, are we?" Weblog Entry. KK Herald. 6 June 2007. 3 June 2008. [http://kkherald.wordpress.com/2007/06/06/man-eaters-of-darfur
-are-we/]

Moeller, Susan D. "A Hierarchy of Innocence". Press/Politics 2002: 49.

Save Darfur. SaveDarfur.org. 27 May 2008. [www.savedarfur.org].

Sudan Tribune. 19 February 2008. Sudan Tribune. [http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article26033]